Great expectations video dating

The dating service had appealed a Small Claims Court decision last January that awarded Parker the full amount.

For the Record Los Angeles Times Sunday June 1, 1986 Home Edition Westside Part 11 Page 4 Column 1 Zones Desk 1 inches; 19 words Type of Material: Correction The name of a woman who won a lawsuit against a video dating service was incorrectly given in a story May 29. Company’s Computers Lopez said he agreed to the 0 award after Great Expectations’ attorney admitted that the company’s computers caused problems with Parker’s membership.

Consumers should have a friend or a lawyer look over the membership contract before signing it, make sure the number of referrals are spelled out, and watch for clauses that allow companies to change membership procedures, she said.

Parker, who now is dating a man she met through a volunteer group, said that as a result of her experience she would not use another dating service, but will try to meet men through more traditional ways.“I’ll just have to go hit-and-miss,” she said.

Such Cases Are Few Shirley Goldinger, director of the Los Angeles County Office of Consumer Affairs, said that Parker’s award was unusual because few people take dating services to court, and many with consumer complaints are afraid to come forward.“I would say that people would be reluctant to file because they would be embarrassed,” she said.

“It takes a particular kind of courage to say that you called 20 people and they would not go out with you.”Most complaints about dating services come from people who succumb to high-pressure sales tactics and who use up the referrals allowed by a service without a successful date, Goldinger said.

He has not experienced problems with the company’s computer, he said.

Parker, a legal secretary who wrote her own legal brief and argued the case in court, said that she filed the suit after Great Expectations failed to answer her request last October to refund part of her

He has not experienced problems with the company’s computer, he said.

Parker, a legal secretary who wrote her own legal brief and argued the case in court, said that she filed the suit after Great Expectations failed to answer her request last October to refund part of her $1,250 one-year membership fee.

Idea Is ‘Very Good’“The idea behind GE is very good.

The same reason was given when she was told that a man on her computer list whom she was interested in reaching was no longer a member, she said.

Eight Men Declined All eight of the men she asked to meet declined to date her, she said. That’s not why you choose that service.”Ullman said his company does not guarantee that its members will find a compatible mate.“We present a person’s pluses and minuses,” he said.

||

He has not experienced problems with the company’s computer, he said.Parker, a legal secretary who wrote her own legal brief and argued the case in court, said that she filed the suit after Great Expectations failed to answer her request last October to refund part of her $1,250 one-year membership fee.Idea Is ‘Very Good’“The idea behind GE is very good.The same reason was given when she was told that a man on her computer list whom she was interested in reaching was no longer a member, she said.Eight Men Declined All eight of the men she asked to meet declined to date her, she said. That’s not why you choose that service.”Ullman said his company does not guarantee that its members will find a compatible mate.“We present a person’s pluses and minuses,” he said.

,250 one-year membership fee.

Idea Is ‘Very Good’“The idea behind GE is very good.

The same reason was given when she was told that a man on her computer list whom she was interested in reaching was no longer a member, she said.

Eight Men Declined All eight of the men she asked to meet declined to date her, she said. That’s not why you choose that service.”Ullman said his company does not guarantee that its members will find a compatible mate.“We present a person’s pluses and minuses,” he said.

Leave a Reply