Accommodating relationship in workplace

Plaintiff rejected the accommodation – though not on religious grounds – because he preferred to stay on his usual day shift. He argued that working evenings imposed too great a hardship on him, even more so as his proposed accommodation was so minimal. The relevant inquiry, it stated, “is not whether the employer’s proposal is better, or more to his liking, but whether the employer’s is reasonable.” Objection to accommodating Muslim employees’ request for time to pray during the work day is often fierce, typified by the view of Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) that it isn’t the responsibility of private companies to The Congressman, referring to a pending dispute over Muslims’ prayer time accommodation at a meat packing plant in the Midwest, stated that “[t]he fact is that, if you take a job that requires your attendance on an assembly line from a point certain to a point certain, and if your religious views do not allow you to do that, then don’t take the job.” Tancredo went on to opine that “[t]here is nothing forcing anybody to take the job. it’s every day and multiple times.” Non-Muslim co-workers have also expressed hostility over what they perceive as favoritism when employers accommodate Muslims’ requests for prayer breaks during the work-day. The break is in addition to a break early in the shift and lunch breaks which are required by law. When word of the plan got out this spring, it created instant controversy, with bloggers going on about the Islam-ification of the university, students divided on the use of their building-maintenance fees, and tricky legal questions about whether the plan was a legitimate accommodation of students’ right to practice their religion or unconstitutional government . No one has put a gun to their head.” Typical too are the comments made by the founder of a conservative legal organization, which has represented Christians and Jews who wanted Saturdays or Sundays off to worship, that “[t]he problem with the Muslim prayer request is that it’s not one day or annual . In a pending lawsuit, for example, two Hertz employees claim that the company discriminated against , No. The timing of the added break will fluctuate during the year to coordinate with the religious timing for Muslim prayers. A security company hired a Muslim woman as a part-time security officer who wore at her interview a religious garment that covered her from head to toe, revealing only her hands and face. Employers often do not see headscarves in the same light, and relying on uniform dress codes, their desire to maintain their corporate image, or the nebulous concept of “customer preference,” have over the years objected to wearing traditional Islamic head coverings at work.Less than a year after 9/11 the EEOC brought a class action against American Airline Plaintiff was a car rental agent, responsible for renting cars and personally interacting with customers at the counter and on the telephone.Over the years the company had routinely accommodated her wish to wear a while working at the front counter and was terminated. The court, holding that the company had a duty to accommodate plaintiff’s religious practice and could not rely on perceived customer preferences to establish that accommodating plaintiff would cause it undue hardship, granted summary judgment against the employer. The general information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only.after she was hired, and told management that she eventually planned to wear a full headpiece, with only her eyes showing. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances.

If we accommodate, the relationship may proceed smoothly, but we may build up frustrations that our needs are going unmet.

Hudson of Neil, Dymott, Frank, Mc Fall, Trexler, Mc Cabe & Hudson APLC was elected as the 2017 President of the Association of Southern California Defense Counsel (ASCDC), one of the nation’s largest State Civil Defense Organizations. Gosseen* Ganfer & Shore, LLP New York, NY Allegations by Muslims of workplace discrimination are rising, with the number of annual complaints more than doubling since 2004, according to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) data.

Muslim employees seeking accommodations to wear hajibs, to set aside time or space for daily prayer, or to perform ablutions before prayers; or, in meatpacking plants, to abstain from handling pork, often meet with antagonism from employers and co-workers. We will briefly examine the post-9/11 history of workplace accommodations of Islamic religious customs., or headscarf, is for many Muslim females a visible expression of their faith, piety or modesty, and represents a tangible manifestation of their religious identity.

The clinic’s management objected, explaining to her that given the nature of the pediatric practice and the reasonable desire of child patients and parents to see the face of the medical staff providers, it could not approve wearing of a full headpiece. [the company] to assume that since the plaintiff was a Muslim it was obvious that he could not touch pork.” 2007 U.

Management told the employee however, that it would consider what reasonable accommodations could be made to its dress code policy.

Leave a Reply